Friday, March 16, 2012

The Tragicomic Science (Part 1)



Economics is a tragicomic praxis par excellence. Tragedy and comedy are seen by Aristotle as two different dramatic modes for talking of two opposite types of human action. The former deals with noble actions, the latter with mean actions. I propound that economics is even more Aristotelian than drama in that while the latter does not create the action it reflects on, the former as a fundamental human activity generates the actions it later encompasses as a discipline. Economics also deals with noble and mean actions with far-reaching significance equally stoically.

Economics is not simply a special way of being and acting in the world. It is also a codified depiction or narration of this mode of being. This economic mode relates to the construction of the world. Aristotle describes the origin and development of drama and poetry in two profound human instincts, namely, imitation and harmony. Imitation is propelled by repetition, in general. Economic activity strives towards harmony in the world through this repetitive imitation or imitative repetition. It is born in the incessant re-enactment of simple acts aimed at producing goods and services necessary for sustaining humanity. This simple repetition diachronically generates increasingly complex forms of social life.

Harmony as order and stability is sought through this vital iterative reproduction of actions by the differentiation of tasks and distribution of produced goods.  However, this repetition, where it bestows order on the world on one hand, can also lead to chaos on the other as the countless repetitions lead to problems of forecasting, control, and information and communication lags in the social system keeping the possibility of conflict ever alive.

Aristotle also maintains that human beings are more imitative in their conduct that all other animals. Human consciousness and the capacity for recollection of one’s difference from others is a prerequisite for imitation because primarily that would be imitated which is not considered to be a part of one’s own self. The repetitive production of life turns upon our crucial ability to act upon nature and by doing so transform the world, nature, and ourselves. This transformational interaction itself is built around repeated acts of creativity, invention and innovation aimed at superseding limits imposed by nature.

The primacy of plot over character is underscored in the Aristotelian view of drama. This corresponds roughly to the relationship between structure (supra-individual forms of social existence like the institutions of the market, state and civil society) and agency (the individual and collective capacity for change). If one looks at the internal coherence enjoyed by economic analysis, irrespective of the school or the type of analysis, one is astonished to find the same constructed completeness and self-sufficiency regarding its propositions, proofs necessarily following from these and the tools of analysis that is considered a prerequisite for the drama’s plot by Aristotle. Just like a bad plot, bad theory is also said to exhibit lack of coherence or specious induction.


No comments: